Get Involved Scholarships Directory Archives Whitepapers Best Practices Member Login Join Job Postings Communications Sales Marketing Events Important Links Marketplace Industry Stats
 

Member Login

 Articles Online
 White Papers
 Presentations
 Newsletters
 Best Practices
 Directory
 Meetings
 Featured Links
 Resource Guide
  Industry Resources
  TMCA Blog
  Resource Guide
  Ask The Expert
  Renew Membership

 Join TMCA
 

U.S. Railroad Deregulation

With passage of the Interstate Commerce Act in 1887, freight railroads became the first U.S. industry to become subject to comprehensive federal economic regulation. For the next 93 years, the federal government, primarily through the Interstate Commerce Commission, would control wide areas of rail operations and management. As railroads faced increasingly more efficient highway, waterway, and pipeline competition, the government proved to be a highly flawed surrogate for the free market. By the 970s, archaic regulations, in combination with strong competition from other modes and changing shipping patterns, drove the rail industry to the brink of ruin. Bankruptcies were common, investment levels were insufficient to maintain rail infrastructure in good condition, rates were rising, and service levels were low. Serious consideration was given to nationalizing the industry.

Fortunately, Congress passed the Staggers Rail Act of 1980. In enacting this legislation, Congress recognized that railroads faced intense competition from trucks and other modes for most freight traffic, but prevailing regulation prevented railroads from competing effectively and earning adequate revenues. Survival of the rail industry required a new regulatory structure that allowed railroads to establish their own routes, tailor their rates and service to market conditions, and differentiate rates on the basis of demand. In short, Congress determined that railroads should be run by railroads, not by government regulators.

The Staggers Act did not completely deregulate the rail industry. In addition to retaining authority over a variety of non-rate areas, the ICC retained the authority to set maximum rates or take certain other actions if a railroad were found to have market dominance or to have engaged in anti-competitive behavior. This act has been beneficial to railroads and their customers. It has enabled railroads to rationalize and upgrade their systems, reinvest hundreds of billions of dollars in productive rail infrastructure and equipment, greatly improve service and increase traffic volume, dramatically increase productivity, improve profitability to more reasonable levels, and sharply improve the safety of their operations-while at the same time dramatically lowering their rates. Then, with the passing of the ICC Termination Act of 1995, the Surface Transportation Board succeeded the ICC as the federal agency responsible for the economic regulation of railroads.


> Back to Rail/Intermodal

 

© 2008 TMCA | Privacy policy